Copyright

«Dai Dai», the 2026 World Cup anthem: an intellectual property operation

«Dai Dai», the 2026 World Cup anthem: an intellectual property operation

· Copyright

"Dai Dai" is not only the 2026 World Cup anthem. It is a multimillion-dollar intellectual property operation that the audience never sees.

Two copyrights in every song

Every recorded song contains at least two separate rights. The composition (melody and lyrics) belongs to the writers and their publishers. The sound recording belongs to whoever financed it, usually a label. Using a song in a broadcast, an advertisement or a stadium requires clearing both. Clearing one and not the other is the most common licensing mistake there is.

Add performers and synchronisation

On top of that sit neighbouring rights for the performers, and a synchronisation license whenever the music is paired with moving images. A tournament anthem is licensed for television, streaming, social media, in-stadium use and sponsor advertising, each with its own scope and its own price.

Why this matters to a small business

The same rules apply to your thirty-second Instagram video. Using a commercial track without a license is copyright infringement even if the post generates no revenue, and platforms increasingly remove or demonetise automatically. Use production music with a written license, or commission a work and take an assignment of rights in writing.

In Mexico, works and contracts of assignment can be recorded before INDAUTOR, which is what gives you something to show when someone challenges your right to use them.

Clearing music in Mexico

Using a song in an ad, a reel or an event needs permissions from more than one owner, and each permission has to be in writing: transfers and licences of economic rights are null by operation of law if they are not (article 30 of the Mexican Federal Copyright Law).

Check the term before you sign. Where the agreement states none, the licence is taken to last five years (article 33), which is a problem when the campaign keeps running or the video stays online indefinitely.

And whatever the licence says, the authors keep their moral rights, which are inalienable, imprescriptible and unwaivable (article 19). That covers attribution and the integrity of the work, so cutting, remixing or re-recording is a separate conversation from paying for use.

See the original post

Leer esta publicación en español

Free, no commitment

Find out if your trademark can be registered

Four out of every ten marks that reach us cannot be registered as they stand. Send us the name and we come back with a straight answer on whether it has an obvious problem. No cost, no commitment. Need the full analysis, signed and in writing? That is the registrability opinion: USD 49 per mark and class plus 16% VAT, credited against your fees if you then file with us.

The free search is a preliminary, indicative review, not a registrability opinion: it is given without a likelihood-of-confusion analysis, without a signed document, and it creates no professional relationship. See the terms and conditions.

Prefer to write? Message us on WhatsApp.

Free guide

The 7 costliest mistakes when registering a trademark in Mexico

The seven that cost a business the most, with the legal basis for each. Leave your email and we send it now.

More on Copyright


Previous "El Pato Merlín": how a street character became a trademark gold mine Next The Devil Wears Prada 2: fashion as an intellectual property asset